It is your "unalienable right" to display your flag in any manner you see fit according to the Declaration of Independence. There was no flag when that was written.
In TEXAS vs. JOHNSON, the highest court in the land held that you can burn your flag. Given how this nation's flag has been desecrated by the violation of citizens' rights, burning this tainted flag is likely the most patriotic act you can commit.
It is the symbol of rights rather than the rights themselves.
When John Adams invoked the Sedition Act of 1798 to suppress the anti-Federalists, he spit on that flag.
Thomas Jefferson reniged on a government contract with Madison in MARBURY V. MADISON, being the first one to violate the Constitution with his aristocratic views as he trampled on that flag.
When Andrew Jackson invoked the Indian Removal Act of 1830, with a forced march of the Cherokees to Oklahoma to steal their homes, lands, and gold, he poured manure on that flag.
When the US Supreme Court held in DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD that a "Negro" was not a person under the Constitution and had no rights, they wrapped that around bloody rags.
When Franklin Delano Roosevelt invoked Presidential Executive Order 9066 to put the citizens of Japanese ancestory [yet not German] into concentration camps in Idaho, he drug that flag through a sewage canal.
People complain how a colored piece of clothe was treated and advocate the violation of those rights in the Declaration of Independence, they soil my military service. What makes our nation unique in the world is our laws protect political speech as a principle.
It is not a principle if it is not used in every case and you cannot convince me a flag or this republic protected those rights. It has been loud and contentious citizens revolting against the House of Misrepresentatives, the Senate of this Roman-like republic, the monarchy we call the President, and the Supreme Court MisJustices.
No mere common citizen can ever desecrate our flag like this republic has.
May 18, 2010
May 14, 2010
San Francisco Boycott & Sanctuary Ordinance
Ask the U.S. Attorney General Holder WHY the Department of Justice and HE are refusing to carry out the law. E-mails to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, may be sent to AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.
Perhaps it is time to boycott San Francisco for violating US Codes on Illegal Immigration.
San Francisco's City Counsel has been in violation of federal law prohibiting giving sanctuary to illegal aliens since 1989 in violation of:
TITLE 8,CHAPTER 12,SUBCHAPTER II,Part VIII, § 1324
Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
(v) (I) engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or
(II) aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts, shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
The City of San Francisco violates federal law with these ordinances:
SEC. 12H.1. CITY AND COUNTY OF REFUGE.
It is hereby affirmed that the City and County of San Francisco is a City and County of Refuge.(Added by Ord. 375-89, App. 10/24/89)
SEC. 12H.2. USE OF CITY FUNDS PROHIBITED.
The prohibition set forth in this Chapter shall include, but shall not be limited to:
(a) Assisting or cooperating, in one's official capacity, with any Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) investigation, detention, or arrest procedures, public or clandestine, relating to alleged violations of the civil provisions of the federal immigration law.
(b) Assisting or cooperating, in one's official capacity, with any investigation, surveillance or gathering of information conducted by foreign governments, except for cooperation related to an alleged violation of City and County, State or federal criminal laws.
(c) Requesting information about, or disseminating information regarding, the immigration status of any individual, or conditioning the provision of services or benefits by the City and County of San Francisco upon immigration status, except as required by federal or State statute or regulation, City and County public assistance criteria, or court decision.
(d) Including on any application, questionnaire or interview form used in relation to benefits, services or opportunities provided by the City and County of San Francisco any question regarding immigration status other than those required by federal or State statute, regulation or court decision. Any such questions existing or being used by the City and County at the time this Chapter is adopted shall be deleted within sixty days of the adoption of this Chapter.(Added by Ord. 375-89, App. 10/24/89)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)